GitHub download partial repository

There may be times when a developer wants one or two projects from a GitHub repository rather than downloading the entire repository.

Prerequisite

  1. Git needs to be installed which can be download here.
  2. Double click on the file once downloaded.
  3. Under options select Windows Explorer integration.
  4. Follow through with the remaining options/prompts e.g. select an editor etc.
Downloading one or more projects
Select a GitHub repository url and the folders to download.

For example, the repository

There are two projects, Events_1 and ExceptionHandling (which Events_1 project references).

Create a folder on the computer, create a batch file with the following commands.

mkdir code
cd code
git init
git remote add -f origin https://github.com/karenpayneoregon/code-samples-csharp
git sparse-checkout init --cone 
git sparse-checkout add Events_1
git sparse-checkout add ExceptionHandling
git pull origin master

Run the batch file, copy the folders to a Visual Studio solution and if needed do a Restore NuGet Package command inside of Visual Studio by right clicking on the solution explorer.

Caveats
  • There will be root files besides the folder but no worries all that is needed are the folders and the entire code folder is a temp folder.
  • Older versions of Git may not work. At the command line or powershell command line type the following to get Git version. git --version The version should be 2.28.0 or better, may work with one version down.






Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

VB.NET Working with Delegate and Events

Introduction From hobbyist to seasoned developers delegates are avoided or attempts are made to understand them, which in many cases is met with frustration. I see questions on various forums where code could be refactored by using delegates and when making suggestions to use delegates generally the response is something like “that is over my head, what I have works!”. Well just because code works does not mean there is room for refactoring. Search the Internet for VB.NET delegates and find out there are an abundance of post while the majority are not fully working examples and may be untested which can lead back to frustration. The first mistake some coders make is not reading Microsoft documentation on delegates or think outside the box and study C# code samples and a decent C# to Visual Basic converter as there are more code samples in C# than Visual Basic. One must understand that there are cases like with MulticastDelegate class there is syntactic difference on how to use them ...
Read more

Coders asking questions in online forums

 Something I've noticed over the years answering questions on various forums is They want someone to adjust their code which is in many cases complete off-base They want simple where simple is not always the case or that what they believe is hard in regards to me supplying a code solution that I see as simple. My solution usually will become simple only if they invest time to study the code rather than look at it and say jess that is over my head. What can be done?  There needs to be for instance a better way to direct these coders to content on the web starting with Microsoft code examples e.g. for C# for instance , Pluralsight, Microsoft TechNet. Where to place this? Perhaps on startup pages for Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code. Coders need to have an incentive to be better and that can only happen with placing learning pages where they are easy to locate and for community leaders e.g. MVP's for instance to stop providing code that works with things like one character va...
Read more

Sometimes VB.NET coders make me wonder (or crazy)

 The following was taken from a die hard VB.NET coder. I believe C# promotes bloated, slow, inefficient, and buggy code, largely in part because people care more about the cosmetics of their code than they do its actual functionality, efficiency, and reusability. Wow, that is one broad stereotype while I've seen more VB.NET write really poor code more than I've seen C# developer and I'm a proponent for VB.NET coders but not for those who think the way as the above person. No matter what language a person works with there are both bad and good coders while from what I've seen between VB.NET and C# from non professionals VB.NET coders are those who tend to write unclean and loose code while for the most part C# coders that are not working professionally really can write sloppy code as a VB.NET coders does simply because a VB.NET coder can turn Option Strict Off or actually never turn it on. Then there is this "Minimization is heard more with coders using VB.NET then ...
Read more